Johnson & Johnson to pay $ 2.1 billion for talc cancer case after Supreme Court rejection

[ad_1]

Johnson & Johnson to pay $ 2.1 billion in damages to women who blamed their ovarian cancer on the drug manufacturer’s baby powder asbestos after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the case.

The lawsuit was the most important against the company, which has fought a wave of litigation and lost several cases, as thousands of people claimed the products led to cancer. The appeal, which was denied Tuesday, was related to a case filed in Missouri in 2018 involving 22 women.

“The court’s decision not to review the Ingham case leaves significant legal issues unresolved that state and federal courts will continue to face,” J&J said, adding that “decades of independent scientific evaluations confirm Johnson’s Baby Powder is it sure doesn’t contain asbestos, and it doesn’t cause cancer. “

Last year, the company said yes stop selling its baby powder in the United States and Canada after sales fell 60% in three years.

Supreme Court judges upheld a Missouri state court ruling in which the jury ordered J&J to pay $ 4.7 billion in damages, although this penalty was later reduced to $ 2.122 billion.

In November, the Missouri state court refused to hear J & J’s appeal, sending the case to the country’s highest court. The drug maker had argued that by filing several separate claims related to talcum powder for a trial before a single jury, the trial had violated J & J’s rights under the procedure established by the U.S. Constitution.

J&J’s share price fell 1.6% on Tuesday morning in New York after it became clear he would not have a chance to make that argument and would have to pay the premium.

Several large U.S. business groups, including the business roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, supported the company’s appeal.

Talcum powder is made from mineral talc which, in its natural form, contains asbestos, a substance that can cause cancer. The healthcare industry agreed in 1976 to ensure that all talc products do not contain detectable levels of asbestos.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *