Chinese fashion giant Giant Shin has been charged with copyright infringement.


News Analysis

China’s fastest-growing fashion online store and the world’s most expensive shopping app, Shin, has been accused of misbehaving with its employees.

On June 15, Florida-based Maggie Stefanos sued Magdalena Molman, a professional parent company of Shane’s parent company, Hong Kong-based Zootop Business, and the Los Angeles-based copyright infringement company for more than $ 100 million. Shein Distribution Corporation.

Since 2018, she has been the subject of allegations of theft involving artists such as Shane in artists and brand names such as Los Angeles-based indie brand Wolfre and Levi Strauss.

Despite the success of the fast-growing e-commerce platform due to rapid production, the labor experience has recently received attention. Shin has been criticized for his poor working conditions at workshops in China.

The road to super fast fashion

A.D. Since 2015, Shane has seen astronomical growth, and by 2021 it has received nearly 177.5 million app downloads worldwide, according to Statista.

The company earned the nickname “Fast Fashion” for its fast production. Contracts with small and medium-sized producers and shops in China and mainly deals with young women under the age of 25 worldwide.

According to the company’s 2021 report, Shin works with 6,000 suppliers on orders.

Shein Distribution Corp. “It offers more than 6,000 new fashion, beauty and lifestyle products every day,” the company said in a statement.

According to Chinese sources, Shin shortened the three-week production process to three days – allowing customers to receive orders within a week, from initial verification and design to final purchase, production and new products.

There is little public information about the company and its founder, even in the Chinese media.

Founder Chris Shu launched in 2008 as a wedding dress e-mail platform. In 2012, the company changed its name to Shin. Xu and his associates maintained a low profile.

However, the success of the company is being questioned.

Over the past three years, Shin or Zopot has been involved in at least 50 federal, trademark or copyright infringements, according to the Wall Street Journal.

While the success is the result of China’s logistics market, warehouse automation, online influencers and extremely low prices, the negative side of the operation has received little attention from the mainstream media.

Photo of the Epic Times
Workers make coats at a clothing company at a Chinese clothing company in Nangong, in eastern China’s Jiangsu Province. (STR / AFP by Getty Images)

Unethical labor practices

When a Tok Talk user uploaded a video in May, the company’s fast-paced production was monitored, which showed unethical labor practices.

The video highlights the various Shin products sent to consumers, including staff notes, requests for help, and public awareness of their problems.

One note (originally written in Chinese and translated into English) says: “SOS! SOS! SOS! We are prisoners in Xiangnan Prison in Hubey Province, China. We have been producing exports for a long time. We work 15 hours a day and eat less food than pigs and dogs eat. We call on the international community to condemn the Chinese government’s ongoing human rights abuses.

Shane denied the allegations and made a statement on Tick Talk stating: “We want to make it clear that we take the supply chain issues seriously. Our strict code of conduct prohibits providers from using children or forced labor and we do not tolerate disobedience.

However, a non-governmental organization in Zurich has exposed Shane’s labor law.

In the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou, “Thousands of Chinese workers spend up to 12 hours a day sewing fabrics to make teens’ dreams come true,” the Public Eye reported in November 2021.

The workers often worked part-time in the so-called Shin Village, near Shane’s headquarters in Guangzhou. In some cases, “they worked more than 75 hours a week,” states the report.

According to Article 36 of the Labor Code of China, the working week should not exceed 44 hours.

Shin denies public allegations in a statement: “Our clients are responsible for the work they do on the leased premises. As for your concerns, we know nothing about disobedience.

Shin contacted the Epoc Times for comment. The company did not respond at the time of writing.

Mary Hong


Mary Hong has contributed to the Epoc Times since 2020. She has reported on human rights and politics in China.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *