[ad_1]
In recent years, there has been speculation about private companies that have been playing games with our personal data for a long time. Without control and control, they have amassed more and more information by billions of people – all to help attract advertising and keep them focused.
We know so much. Those steps taken at the beginning of the social media era are having little known results today, with governments and nonprofits finally playing the role of giving citizens the right to privacy when it comes to AI and information online. These are the key elements of the EU-led energy dynamics from technology giants and governments to the people.
1 See gallery
Jules Polonetsky: CEO of the Future Privacy Forum; Co-founder of Israel Tech Policy Institute
(Photo courtesy)
“Europe has built a huge control structure for AI,” explained Julius Polonetsky, executive director of the future Privacy Forum and founder of the Israel Tech Policy Institute. As a result, companies, even beginners, must understand what the rules are, or they will have no business. Citing the GDP’s four-year anniversary and following the laws of some US states, Polonetsky praised the work of governments that understand the pressure to control technology companies.
It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post. If it does, it will start with respect and control that we have never seen before. Many Israeli companies view the United States as one of their first markets, and if we have a strict regulatory framework, it will start to honor a lot of work, effort and sometimes even the edge. They use data.
Earlier this month, Polonetsky visited Israel for Cyber Week, bringing together leading privacy advocates, top privacy experts, and top privacy officials from companies such as Apple and eBay. As the future CEO of the Privacy Forum, it helps to highlight the importance of online data privacy. Prior to that, he was AOL’s Chief Privacy Officer.
“Our privacy people are loading security people, so if they decide, follow the way they think they need information – and in a world of information protection where some of us want to create boundaries,” he told CiteTech. “We don’t want a world of 100% monitoring, even if it makes us safe: ማግኘት Privacy to get information to people and ‘what are you doing?’ He says. “
The future of the Privacy Forum needs a balance to ensure that governments or companies can protect citizens, and it gives us some space to express ourselves without worrying about being foolish, private or being monitored. The issues can affect anything that comes from Adtech – chatting with friends and seeing ads for those topics – such as fraud, discriminatory behavior or invasion of privacy.
Companies are trying to overcome these challenges by making their own rules – which can have unintended consequences. For example, when Apple sets its own rules for what kind of data applications to use in their app store, it could result in “death penalty” for companies that accidentally break the rules. “This is a very powerful way of controlling,” says Polonetsky.
Governments around the world have finally realized that it is important to leave these issues to the companies to get the final word. Companies that fight to eliminate unspoken content, such as terrorism or child pornography, may be good, but slide down can occur when privacy is compromised and social media companies such as Facebook or Twitter can determine the outcome.
“If you want to remove the president or decide what hate crime is, this is not about the Silicon Valley executive, this is about the democratic process.” “Europe is leading strict sanctions on what content to download,” he said. Monitoring procedures, at the end of the day, are probably a good thing. They are not the leaders of Silicon Valley or the beginners of technology to determine the future of our democracy.
Governments that control data management and AI applications may seem like a strong first step in controlling rights and freedoms, but more headaches occur when partisan political poison enters the mix. Conservatives and liberals often disagree on what constitutes free speech, and technology companies have in the past quietly silenced some political commentaries or voices promoting fake information about Covi-19. Lines of freedom and privacy are becoming increasingly difficult to cross.
“We need to be careful not to create a tool for governments to censor their opponents or make unwise decisions,” he told Citizen. “At the end of the day, it is a democratic and moral process to balance the conflicting rights and obligations of individuals and society.” For people in the future of privacy, government and tech companies have one thing in common.
Polonetsky added, “I have the right to delete my data or ask people when they are with me.” You can see how these superpowers – big companies, government players with your data – are constrained by setting boundaries, structures and objectives around what they can do with the information, ”he said.
[ad_2]
Source link
