Republicans are moving to block federal funding for abortion travel costs

[ad_1]

brand newNow you can listen to Fox News articles!

More than two dozen House Republicans introduced legislation this week that would bar the federal government from spending any money on out-of-state travel for women to obtain abortions.

The bill has no chance of advancing under the Democratic leadership. But it’s a clear sign of how the GOP is trying to uphold the Supreme Court’s July decision to challenge Roe v. Wade, arguing that there is no constitutional right to abortion and that states have the power to establish their own abortion laws.

Immediately after the decision, pro-abortion groups and their Democratic allies began planning to fund out-of-state travel, for example, for women seeking abortions within 12 weeks of pregnancy when their home state prohibits abortion after six weeks. Pregnancy.

Some companies have said they will pay for women to travel out of state for abortions, and a few House Democrats have proposed legislation to establish federal subsidies to help women offset the cost of the travel. In July, Rep. Marilyn Strickland, D-Wash., said, “Access to safe and legal reproductive health care, including abortion, should not be limited to those who can afford to travel.”

Support for legal abortion rises after Dobbs buyout, which could affect midterm election results: WSJ poll

Republican Act, by Rep. Ralph Norman, RS.C. It was introduced to ensure that the federal government plays no role in funding abortion-related interstate travel.

By Republican Ralph Norman, RS.C.  The introduced Republican bill aims to ensure that the federal government plays no role in funding abortion-related interstate travel.

By Republican Ralph Norman, RS.C. The introduced Republican bill aims to ensure that the federal government plays no role in funding abortion-related interstate travel.
(manuscript)

Norman’s “no federal funds for abortion travel expenses” states that no federal funds can be used to support abortion services “financially or logistically for travel to another state.” The proposal is an extension of the Hyde Amendment, which would have prohibited direct funding for abortions for years if the mother’s life is at risk, such as rape, consanguinity, or carrying a fetus that causes the fetus to die.

If Republicans can’t run with Democrats on abortion, they can’t run on anything.

Pro-choice activists react to the Supreme Court's historic decision to overturn Roe and Wade.

Pro-choice activists react to the Supreme Court’s historic decision to overturn Roe and Wade.
(Fox News Digital)

Norman said the bill, which has 26 Republican sponsors, rejects Democratic attempts to create a federal funding system for out-of-state travel.

Vulnerable House Democrats are often reluctant to say whether there should be any restrictions on abortion.

“It is absolutely unacceptable that Senate Democrats and the Biden administration are doing everything they can to support abortion in this post-Roe world,” Norman said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

President Biden addressed the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, in Dobbs & Jackson Women's Health.

President Biden addressed the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, in Dobbs & Jackson Women’s Health.
(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

“Considering that the Supreme Court recently left the issue of abortion to the states, it is very painful to use federal funds for this purpose,” he said. “Remember, many Democrats, including our president, have held the view that abortion should only be used in rare cases. My Republican colleagues and I will stand down whenever the federal government tries to interfere with the right to life.”

Click here to access the FOX NEWS app

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *