[ad_1]
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld two voting laws in Arizona under which opponents said they discriminated against racial minorities, in a major decision that could make it difficult to challenge voting restrictions which is enacted in states of the United States.
The case, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, focused on two voting provisions in Arizona. The former banned “ballot collection,” in which third parties collected and left early votes. The second led to the rejection of the ballots that were thrown at the wrong venue.
In a 6-3 decision published Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected claims that Arizona’s voting laws were discriminatory.
Samuel Alito wrote the opinion, along with the other five conservative jurists on the nine-member bank: John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Elena Kagan wrote the dissent, along with the other two Liberals, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.
Alito said none of the voting restrictions violated section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits any election regulations that “result in a denial or abbreviation of the right of any U.S. citizen to vote by reason or color “.
“The rule outside of the Arizona precinct enforces the requirement that voters who choose to vote in person on Election Day must do so at their assigned precincts. They must identify their own polling place and then travel.” there to vote does not exceed the “usual burdens of voting,” Alito wrote. “On the contrary, these tasks are quintessential examples of the usual burdens of voting.”
But Kagan argued that the court had undermined section 2 “and the right it provides.”
“Most fear that the statute that Congress wrote is too‘ radical, ’which would invalidate too many state voting laws,” he wrote. “Therefore, most write their own set of rules, limiting Section 2.”
The verdict comes at the end of the Supreme Court’s term, the first since Conservative Barrett took the bench after the death of Liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg last September. Barrett’s confirmation tipped the court’s balance sheet, 6-3, in favor of jurists appointed by Republican presidents.
Supreme Court judges are appointed by life presidents, but their candidacies must be confirmed by a simple majority in the United States Senate.
Progressive activists have called on Breyer, the oldest judge on the bench, to step aside so U.S. President Joe Biden can appoint another Liberal to the nine-member tribunal ahead of the midterm elections. next year, when the two chambers of Congress will be controlled. . Breyer, 82, has not commented.
[ad_2]
Source link
