[ad_1]
David O. Russell Amsterdam In the year It is one of the biggest flops of 2022. Russell’s film cost $80 million to make over seven years, grossed just $32 million worldwide in its theatrical run this fall, and cost Disney north of $100 million. The performance will undoubtedly put Russell back in director’s jail, but I’m not saying the film is without its merits, however, especially for Taylor Swift haters.
**some Amsterdam Spoilers to follow, so avert your eyes if you’re sensitive!!**
ok still with me
So why do the haters so dislike this dense but delightfully strange power of love, friendship and subtle art that everyone who has seen it loves so much? Taylor Swift runs in a jalopy (!!) in the opening minutes of the movie and sets the whole scene of the movie in motion. Yes, you read that right. David O. Russell dressed the world’s most famous singer – millions of Swifties around the world spend hundreds of dollars to sit hundreds of meters away – in a period costume from the 1930s, when her character’s crown was the sweetest. My father dies and then a vehicular homicide happens 13 minutes straight into the movie. Don’t you believe me? I got receipts!
And why do you wonder why the Swifties haven’t turned out in droves to drag their millennial queen at the box office? You are crazy for this, David!
Now, let’s take a look at this author’s stance on both Taylor Swift and David O. Let’s get one thing straight so you don’t misinterpret Russell. First off, I consider myself a card-carrying Swiftie; For proof, I humbly submit 2022’s Spotify Wrapped, where Taylor sits behind her ex Harry Styles on my most-listened-to list. I’ve long admired Swift’s many gifts as a singer and performer, and on a personal note, I find inspiration in the way she uses long-simmering grudges and a perceived need for success.
Perhaps more controversially, I also read David O. I have been a longtime fan of Russell’s work. Yes, I’m very aware that he beat up Lily Tomlin on set, got into a rivalry with George Clooney on set, and kicked his transgender niece off the set. I don’t find this behavior cool, or defensive. Simply put: Is he the sort of person I’d invite over for tea and crackers? Probably not. (Let’s be honest. I’m scared and more than a little scared.) But does Russell have so many amazing, complex, aesthetically pleasing and often hilarious movies under his belt? It will! Undeniable! If my feelings seem to represent a disturbing dichotomy of conflicting positions—he’s a bad guy who makes a good movie—my main defense is that many of us Gen Xers have the ability to separate the art from the artist.
And as an artist, Russell is not afraid to take risks. I don’t really believe in the “end justifies the end” thing in general, especially if you’re often underestimating your co-workers and subordinates, but Russell tends to get results. That’s why the likes of Christian Bale (another complicated guy!), Margot Robbie, Robert De Niro, John David Washington, Anya Taylor-Joy, Rami Malek, Timothy Olyphant, Michael Shannon, Zoe Saldana, Mike Myers, and Chris Rock have all signed on. Until being in Amsterdam. (For everyone, I wish Chris Rock didn’t take this role.) Russell is the kind of director who isn’t afraid to take the heat, firing a live round into Redaver to show the devastating effects of bullets on the human body. , nor does he hesitate to show pop princess Taylor Swift driving a motor vehicle. He’s not a perfect man and he doesn’t make perfect movies, but in today’s cinematic landscape crowded with cookie-cutter cap crusaders, I’ll continue to give Russell a chance as long as his flawed but wholly unique films continue to find people. to finance them. (After that AmsterdamBut this is easier said than done.)
[ad_2]
Source link
