[ad_1]
“Changing the rules and downgrading the Formula 1 cars to avoid fouling is in principle the same as introducing the halo,” explains McLaren technical director James Key.
The new technical rules that came into effect this year put more emphasis on ground impact, creating low-performance and stiffer cars to maximize performance, and ultra-vertical swings with aerodynamic impact but inherently lower ride quality.
Although some cars do not suffer from overdoses, drivers from all groups have the worst concerns about the physical comfort of these cars and the most serious concerns related to long-term damage to the brain and spine.
The FIA has decided to intervene in the short term regarding the changes for 2022 and 2023, aiming to eliminate the possibility of porpoise by raising the height of the floor mat and the height of the floor mat throat.
Some groups are pushing back due to the performance and cost implications of a set of significant changes and the late nature, this is a very sensitive time during the development of the 2023 car.
Key believes now that the FIA has decided this is a critical safety issue, it cannot change its mind and believes it will be bad for the regime if it does nothing. [the issue] It’s still there in 2023.”
It’s a similar argument to when the halo cockpit protection device was controversially forced to pass in the 2018 season, partly due to fears of the consequences if the FIA pressured it, delayed it and caused a serious accident.
Key admitted it was “a bit of a strange parallel” to draw a halo because it was a “completely different project” and a “different order of magnitude” in terms of driver safety.
“But there were a lot of villains back then,” he said.
You remember all the comments that said “it looks terrible”, it’s not Formula 1. All this stuff.
“And he said, ‘Well, why on earth don’t you? There is definitely a danger. And now that we have found it after a few years, look how grateful we are, we have seen some things in the right way.
“This is a completely different order of magnitude, much lower. But it’s the same thing.
“So let’s go fix it. It doesn’t do the sport any favors on the basis that it’s dangerous.
“Of course it costs money to research within the price range, we can do without. It’s a small estimate, but it’s true.
“Why don’t you just do the sensible thing — for safety reasons, because that’s the bottom line — and just leave it at that?”
The FIA is likely to force changes over safety concerns and concerns over fouling and undermining, particularly after drivers suffered major problems at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix.
That, and the conclusion from the FIA’s medical team that the new generation of vehicles could have serious long-term consequences for drivers, is believed to be why FIA president Mohamed Ben Sulaiman stepped in and pushed his organization into action.
Although there has been no porpoising problem in recent races and teams continue to find better solutions to overcome the problem themselves, this is partly due to the tracks used.
The view of the FIA technical department is that the low-power acquisitions planned for 2023 will exacerbate the problem again.
“If you have a security issue, you can’t stand back and say it’s not really a problem,” Key said.
“It’s very difficult to simulate and predict promiscuity,” he said.
“We know ways to get rid of them. But if you add some kind of growth or low energy, it can come back very quickly.
“So instead of taking that risk, I think it’s worth a full trial from the FIA’s point of view, but it shows that we’re taking it seriously and we’re doing something about it after the concerns that some people have raised.” of drivers.
“I’m not saying it’s negligent, but you have to be careful here.
“You can’t think teams are going to do it. And it may not be everyone’s priority.
“Each team can have an opinion depending on whether they have a foul problem or where they are in the Championship.
“We will not do it, we have a special development plan, which is working well. But we still think it’s a good idea.
“So we didn’t have an agenda here. It’s a great deal, really, we could all do without it. We don’t want it to escalate again. We don’t want anyone to get hurt.
I think you can try and simplify it by looking at simple steps, it’s the best thing to do instead of relying on these brilliant people who don’t prioritize every day and fix it.
[ad_2]
Source link
